That’s why, unlike contemporary
“mainstream” psychiatry (and its hypothesis that symptoms are just Signs
of Pathological Biological Processes) or C.B.T (and the “Mind over
Matter” hypothesis that symptoms can be eliminated by conscious will and the
application of symptom-tailored Cognitive Techniques), Psychodynamic Theory
inspires upon its practitioners the Ethical Imperative to neither
“attack” the symptoms nor “treat” them with anything other than the
respectful care appropriate to the knowledge of their conflictual,
painful origin.
That’s why the main focus of a
psychodynamic practitioner’s work becomes to support and facilitate any
suffering person to revisit the areas of mental conflict (often again
and again and through different “pathways”), ask the painful questions from
new perspectives, find the resources and the power (“dynamis”) to
work through them and produce new, less compromised (and often
enough less compromising) answers to the conflicts-questions which
had captivated his/her existence until then.
During such a process the
suffering man/woman may be able to be surprised by the discovery that
“the walls” (i.e. the unconsciously constructed “defences”) “sometimes move”,
indeed they do. When something of this nature and importance occurs,
the practitioner may allow himself/herself to be surprised anew by the
re-discovery that questions about the “patient’s” dietary and other “habits”
have become less relevant indeed.
<< |